Ageism in Ashland Is Alive and Well!

The Ashland Senior Center is in crisis. The recent changes and prospective plans by Ashland Parks and Recreation Commission (APRC)  to dismantle the senior center’s dedicated programs under the false name of “multigenerational” goals are an attack on seniors and their families.
To ignore the special needs of seniors is ageism. The APRC’s elimination of expert senior center staff who provided information and referral, outreach and other social services to cut staffing costs is ageism in action. APRC Commissioners and Director dismissing inputs from seniors and their advocates are acts of ageism. 
Seniors protested in unity on August 8th and 9th when APRC gave one day’s notice of changes that replaced expert senior center staff with regular Recreation staff and volunteers. Seniors also objected APRC’s plans to move the crucial social services out of the senior center to another location. Yet APRC did not value the seniors feedback. Evidently the APRC commissioners who have no experience in senior issues believed they knew best and approved the changes in clear spite by saying they came into the meeting to approve them.
The seniors then went to Ashland’s City Council on September 5th for help and was met with “what can we do?” Ignoring the seniors’ vital concerns because they have less physical and mental stamina to stand up for themselves is ageism. 
When a concern was raised about making elderly seniors give their home addresses during the public forum comment section at city council meetings, the city’s response of “that is what we always require” shows lack of sensitivity to elders’ protective needs. To make elderly seniors in their 80’s and 90’s sit for long periods during APRC meetings until the discussion gets to senior issues is downright uncaring.
For 43+ years the Ashland Senior Center has provided model social services to give initial assessments for effective, timely information and referrals to seniors and their families in difficult situations. With one action, the safety net has been shredded. The new Recreation staff will not know the difference between handing someone a senior resources booklet and providing specific custom advice. APRC will view it as a simpler less costly way to operate.
Ageism is alive and well in Ashland.
Sue Wilson

1 Response

  1. Laura C Davis

    I am wondering if there is possibility of an APRC committee and SOS to collaborate on revamp of the Senior Center? Keep what works and perhaps bring in new ideas and services. Bring together the people with hands-on experience with people who seem to want to offer a new vision, and out of that collaboration, something even more responsive can be created. We all fear change, young and old alike. I support the call for more multi-generational programs. I enjoy the younger generation teaching me new tricks, while i teach them my old tricks. Can’t we all work on this together? I’ve been reading the minutes from meetings held earlier in the year, and in September of last year, about proposals for the Senior Center. I wonder why our community didn’t get involved in possible changes back then? I myself never read minutes for any community meetings. I had better start, it seems.

    There is no escaping this fundamental truth: As I am, so shall you be, said from an elder to a younger. A solid, responsive Senior Center is an investment in everyone’s future, not just the current elder population’s present.

    I agree that this situation has been poorly handled. And i believe it can be mended, and strengthened. However, casting fear on the community about our neglected seniors doesn’t feel helpful. It feels, well, fear-mongering. Don’t we have enough of that already, in our nation? Ageism is alive and well in our society, yes. In many forms, not the least which is our under-served middle-schoolers who have no where to go after school, with parents working and no teen center. A multi-generational meeting place, teens assisting seniors, is perhaps just what our community needs.

//inserted by Sharon